He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Retarded question: who is the "he" it's talking about? u.u
ReplyDeleteummm...the..people??
ReplyDeleteOkay, I could be wrong, seeing I am the one who doesn't know, but I really don't think the "he" is the "people". Look at the first phrase where it says, "His invasions on the rights of the people." See? So, does ANYONE know who "he" is?
ReplyDeleteits talking about the indevidual.The men.They didn't consider women as equal.
ReplyDeleteHuh??? I don't get it... o.O
ReplyDelete